After a successful sanity test in the acceptance environment, it's puzzling when code breaks despite no new deployments or changes being made. This situation can be caused by several underlying factors. Potential causes may include environmental inconsistencies, such as differences in configuration settings, server performance issues, or data discrepancies between test runs. External dependencies like third-party services or APIs might also introduce changes that were not accounted for during testing. Additionally, timing-related or concurrency issues may not surface during initial tests but cause functionality to fail under different conditions. Identifying the root cause requires a thorough investigation into both the test environment and any external factors that could impact the system's behavior.
What could cause code to break after a successful sanity test in the acceptance environment, especially when no new deployment or changes have been made?
+5
+1I add:
Usage by humans. The bug was maybe always there, but somehow the user did something just slightly different than before which triggered it.
No product is bug free. They always have unrecognized ones.
+5I add:
Usage by humans. The bug was maybe always there, but somehow the user did something just slightly different than before which triggered it.
No product is bug free. They always have unrecognized ones.
Hi
User interaction often uncovers issues that may have existed unnoticed for some time. A small variation in how a user engages with the product can trigger bugs that weren't previously identified.
No product is entirely free of bugs; there are always undiscovered issues that surface under different conditions or usage patterns. Continuous testing and real-world usage are key to revealing and addressing these hidden problems.
Reply
Login to the community
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.